Posts Tagged ‘ sem-industry ’

Are you going to PubCon in Las Vegas next week?

If you’re one of those undecided, last-minute decision makers, there’s only one conference candidate you need to vote for–PubCon!

You have until midnight to register! - be sure to use the discount code “be-48020″ to save a whopping 20%!

It’s the one event I try not to miss because it offers a great selection of sessions–from beginner to super-advanced–and some of the best networking opportunities of the year.

On Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, you’ll see me roaming the halls with my camera in hand–stop me if you want your photo taken!

I’m also speaking on three panels:

And moderating two more:

If you want to know the latest on the after-hours parties/networking Joseph Morin will be your man. And you may want to follow me on Twitter–because I tend to have more time to “live Tweet” sessions, than I do “live blog.”

If you’re going, I hope to see you there!

Pilgrim’s Partners: Is a blogger attacking your company without you knowing? Monitor your online reputation with Andy Beal’s Trackur–try it for free!

Excerpt from:
The Election is Over, Now You Need to Focus on PubCon!

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

I’ll admit it, I’m not a heavy user of paid search services, but today’s Google AdWords Quality Score changes have me picturing SNL’s Weekend Update team going “Oh really, Google?”

More precise Quality Score calculation
Clickthrough rate (CTR) is the most significant component of Quality Score because it directly indicates which ads are most relevant to our searchers. As you probably have observed, ads in high positions typically earn better CTR than those in low positions, because ads in high positions are more visible to searchers. To calculate the most accurate Quality Scores, it’s important that the influence of ad position on CTR be taken into account and removed from the Quality Score.

In the coming days, we’ll update the portion of the Quality Score algorithm that accounts for ad position. This will result in more accurate Quality Scores, ensure that ads compete fairly for position based on their quality and bid, and enable Google to show the most relevant ads to searchers by rewarding high-quality advertisers with better ad positions.

Oh really, Google? You didn’t previously think that ads that appeared higher on the page would receive an unfairly higher click-through-rate? Oh really? All the eye-tracking and click-tracking studies EVER conducted, just happened to escape your notice until today? Really?

Teasing aside, if you’re a big AdWords user you’ll likely welcome the above Quality Score change–and pee your pants when you see the other major change announced:

Higher quality ads above the search results
We’re also improving the way we determine which ads show in the yellow region above the search results. These positions are particularly valuable to advertisers because they are prominently positioned on the page. Given their prominence, it’s especially important that these ads be high quality; we therefore place extra emphasis on quality when determining which ads to show in this location.

To appear above the search results, ads must meet a certain quality threshold. In the past, if the ad with the highest Ad Rank did not meet the quality threshold, we may not have shown any ads above the search results. With this update, we’ll allow an ad that meets the quality threshold to appear above the search results even if it has to jump over other ads to do so. For instance, suppose the ad in position 1 on the right side of the page doesn’t have a high enough Quality Score to appear above the search results, but the ad in position 2 does. It’s now possible for the number 2 ad to jump over the number 1 ad and appear above the search results. This change ensures that quality plays an even more important role in determining the ads that show in those prominent positions.

The new changes aren’t live yet, so keep an eye on your AdWords account.

More:
Google Updates AdWords Quality Score; Well, Duh!

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

There’s a treasure trove of Internet marketing wisdom in instructional videos (and, of course, funny ones, too) around the Internet. But that was kind of the problem—they were all around the Internet. Now, instead of scouring SEOmoz, Matt Cutts’s archives and YouTube for all the good marketing knowledge, you can turn to one central source: IMBroadcast.com.

IMBroadcast won’t just be a collection of videos, either. Cofounder Loren Baker of Search Engine Journal says:

We are hoping that IMBroadcast.com will become more than simply a video sharing site, we want it to become a community. Our thought process behind the site is that IMBroadcast.com will become a tool for educating visual learners that are attempting to understand Internet Marketing concepts, as well as a platform for experienced and new marketers to interact. Like YouTube, Google’s video sharing community, IMBroadcast.com will be open to its members to upload all forms of Internet Marketing oriented videos, rants, video blogs and tutorials as well as rank, subscribe to and comment on these videos.

Like YouTube indeed. The IMBroadcast homepage is modeled after the YouTube homepage—which in the end is probably a good idea, as it’s an easy way to feature recently viewed, popular and sponsored videos at a glance, as well as being a layout that most (if not all) of us already understand.

In addition to Loren Baker, IMBroadcast was founded by Search & Social’s Jordan Kasteller (not to be confused with our own . . . well, me!) and David Snyder (not to be confused with—oh, wait, it is our own David Snyder!)

In addition to Internet marketing videos from all over the web, IMBroadcast will offer live streaming video. To celebrate their launch this week, they’ll be streaming Scary SEO today and tomorrow. Be sure to tune in!

View original post here:
Internet Marketing Video Central: IMBroadcast.com

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

By Brent D. Payne

[Update: When you’re done reading this post, be sure to read Rand Fishkin’s response in the comments.]

Rand generated a post on Sunday titled, 6 Lessons from the Search Engineers at SMX East, where Rand stated  the session was ‘if not the best … very close to it’ that he has ever attended. I was quite shocked by the bold statement as I didn’t find the session to be anything earth shattering. Personally, I thought it was a regurgitation of the same things we have known for quite some time now.

I’ll go through each of Rand’s takeaways and provide my feedback:

  1. Using Session IDs - Rand mentioned that the search engines have de-duping capabilities for session IDs in URLs. But how PageRank is assigned is still unknown. Rand was smart to mention ‘smart SEOs should, if possible, not use the IDs in the URL and, if they are employed, use 301 redirects to insure proper flow of link equity’.
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering – We know this already. It’s even in the Google Webmaster Guidelines (see http://zi.ma/Session-IDs-bad). Google even uses the word ‘may’ which, to me, means they try but don’t have it down decent enough to state it’s okay to include session IDs.
  2. Affiliate Links – Rand mentions that the search engines ‘shockingly’ stated ‘that if affiliate links came from valuable, relevant, trust-worthy sources - bloggers endorsing a product, affiliates of high quality, etc. - they would be counted in link algorithms. … [Nor was it] necessary to mark these [links] with a nofollow or other method of blocking link value.’
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering – Again we know this already. This goes back to good quality content is paramount to everything else. It also leads back to trusted domains and how trusted domains are treated. Furthermore it leads to the search engines’ overall goals of providing quality, relevant information to their users. There was even a panel I attended that underscored the benefit of having an in-house affiliate program for this exact reason—the ability to utilize your affiliate network for inbound, anchor text rich, inbound links. I’ve written previously (sorry no link as I killed that consulting site because I am starting a new consulting company) that one of the largest wins at OneCall was the utilization of their affiliate program properly to generate anchor text rich inbounds from sites such as DealNews.com which has a PR6 and provides a real value to its users. THE BIG QUESTION though is what does Google consider trust-worthy sources versus spammy affiliate sites? I argue we have no clue and that every webmaster is going to assume their site isn’t spammy and thus won’t include a nofollow. Again, net gain from this question and subsequent answer was very little, if any.
  3. False Positives in Spam – Rand mentioned that search engines agree that false positives with spam does occur (thought the percentages are low) and when it does to contact the search engines to get it fixed.
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering – Ummm. Because it doesn’t say anything that’s not very, very obvious? The search engines make mistakes (really?? I thought they were perfect). When they make a mistake regarding your site tell them (holy cow! Let them know if they made a mistake – no way!!!). I am tossing out some jabs on this one because I think Rand can handle it and I feel we have a decent relationship. I just don’t think this one should have been included in the list of six things. ;-) I still love ya Rand . . . LOL
  4. Links are Still Huge – Rand states, “When asked if links are the primary signal for search engine rankings, the engineers generally agreed that, yes, it probably is.”
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering - If the search engineers would have been less dodgy in their response then I would agree with Rand on this one completely. Even so, I do feel this one has some value but not noteworthy enough to still yet be earth-shattering. Just read how Rand even worded the response from the search engineers. He included ‘generally agreed’ and ‘probably is’. Later Rand even mentions the search engineers use escape clauses like ‘may not be the most important signal’. Rand does note worthily mention that Yahoo! stated that links are more important than even title tags. I wasn’t shocked by this as title tags are an on-page factor and links are an off-page factor. It’s generally understood that off-page factors are weighted more heavily than on-page factors. I believe this is because webmasters have less control of off-page factors than on-page factors and thus the trust of off-page factors is higher with search engine algorithms. The call out from Yahoo! though that links are more important than title tags is at least a definitive statement and definitive statements are noteworthy.
  5. Sitemaps Shouldn’t Be Ignored – Rand underscores what the search engines said about sitemaps. He also mentions some new information from the search engines that there is a gain in traffic by using sitemaps. However, I think Rand is a bit too much in Linkscape land of late thinking that the search engines are giving you a boost just because you have a sitemap. Rand states, “after building just a small portion of a search engine with Linkscape, we can certainly feel how and why engines would appreciate and bestow benefits upon those who properly incorporated sitemaps.” I don’t think you get a boost for having a sitemap because the search engines appreciate it and bestow a benefit directly but rather indirectly.
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering – The search engines have been telling us for eons to build a sitemap. They have mentioned that it helps with canonicalization (I think that was Matt Cutts), they have mentioned that it helps discoverability (I think John Mueller or even perhaps Vanessa Fox, the Googler not Exoogler), and that it helps to trim unneeded URL parameters from the indexed versions of a piece of content. Again though I say we already know all this stuff. Nothing new.
  6. PageRank Sculpting Should Be Tested – I make it well known that I am a fan of PageRank sculpting. In fact I have even instituted a dynamic nofollow/PageRank attribution system at Tribune (see SEO Level 5, SEO Level 4, SEO Level 3, SEO Level 2, SEO Level 1 and note that strikethrough text is also nofollowed not just the red highlights). I am confident that it makes a noticeable difference on high PageRank sites that have oodles of links on particular pages. When you wipe out 200 links on a PR8 page and funnel those down to a handful of links . . . it makes a difference.
    Why this isn’t earth-shattering - Now . . . granted I believe that Fishkin, Clay, and Payne are the only major proponents of PageRank Sculpting and Siloing (and yes siloing is slightly different than funneling in my opinion) and I appreciate any plug that Rand can provide to prove that it’s something a webmaster should take a look at, but in this case, the search engines didn’t say anything more than they normally do. They said it’s a factor. They’ve said that before. They also spent several minutes making the point that it’s ‘just one factor’, it’s ‘not something a webmaster should spend a lot of time on’, it’s ‘one of hundreds of factors’, blah blah blah. They always downplay it and for good reason. What was earth-shattering was what some of the search engines said at some of the networking events about the way in which they handle nofollows—which I am not sharing. Sorry, there are times when it is best to STFU. ;-)

In closing, I’d like to mention that I found the session interesting. It was worth the time spent in the session and the part where Nathan Buggia of Live Search Webmaster Central telling a site owner that the webmaster should post videos of tazing cats was hilarious. I personally pictured Nathan tazing Matt’s cats and posting it up on YouTube in a ‘cat’napping style video demanding a ransom from Matt to deliver 20% of Google’s market share to Microsoft. (Yeah, I have issues…yeah, I pictured it all in a matter of milliseconds…again, I have issues.)

However, I don’t feel it would rate as one of my best sessions I ever attended. Hearing Rand state such as his opinion made me take pause and reflect upon the session once again and, as stated above, it made me feel even more strongly that the session wasn’t anything earth-shattering. I respect Rand’s opinion of the session and openly state that I feel he is one of the brightest minds in Search. Furthermore, no disrespect to Danny Sullivan and the session or conference as a whole—it was well worth attending, not only for networking opportunities but for material as well.

About Brent D. Payne

Brent D. Payne is the person leading the charge for SEO within Tribune Interactive where he recently doubled the number of unique visitors from search engines (year over year) for the Tribune Interactive properties such as Chicago Tribune and L.A. Times. He works closely with both editorial leads and technical leads within Tribune as well as working with external companies such as search engines, outside consultants, or other enterprise sites. When Brent isn’t doing SEO, he is . . . well, doing SEO. Yeah, it pretty much consumes his life . . . at least when he doesn’t have his 5-year old son.

Pilgrim’s Partners: Is a blogger attacking your company without you knowing? Monitor your online reputation with Andy Beal’s Trackur–try it for free!

See more here:
6 Things We Heard Again from the Search Engineers at SMX East

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

By Brent D. Payne

[Andy’s note: Want to know what Brent did before lunch? Check out part 1 here.]

1:00pm – 1:30pm – Get some type of food

Don’t forget to eat. Yeah, that’s about all I have to say on that. Other than don’t down a bunch of food that’s going to leave you lethargic later in the day. You need to stay motivated, your day is only half way done.

1:30Pm – 2:00pm – PageRank siloing and mainly PageRank consolidation

I’m a believer in both PageRank siloing and PageRank consolidation. In fact I’ve gone so far as to build dynamic tools to help me do so in different scenarios (more on that with a later post). This utilizes nofollow techniques but also utilizes 301 redirects to consolidate content pages into landing pages. I also attempt to create proper themes (though I have a lot of work still to do). Try a little bit of this every day. I’d recommend a lot of planning before execution and make sure it can be easily undone, just in case you make a mistake. I know I made a few of them and still have less than optimal situations on the Tribune sites still. L

2:00pm – 3:00pm – Calls to the local markets from L.A. to Florida. Discuss, train, find opportunities.

You need to find out what is happening ‘in the trenches’. Discuss what concerns or opportunities are out in the field. Engage with your content creators. Whether that is a team of thousands or just a handful, your content producers should be focused on SEO continually and engaging with them daily will keep SEO in the front of their mind when writing.

3:00pm – 4:00pm – Hands on technical and CMS changes (actually edit the meta data and content)

This when I roll up my sleeves and dive into the opportunities that exist that I can make an immediate impact with via simple changes like title tags, H1s, H2s, link structure, etc. I’m in a unique situation in that Google spiders us every 5 minutes or so (they have to with breaking news situations). Your opportunities may not be as immediate but getting your hands dirty on a daily basis helps you to recognize workflow problems within the system and will allow you to empathize with your different teams about CMS problems. If you can help alleviate some of the work flow issues under the guise of SEO from time to time, you will win a lot of equity with your teams. Happy teams are more useful teams.

4:00pm – 4:30pm – Search engine relationship development (IM, call, DM, Facebook, etc. SE contacts)

Yes, I have the search engines phone numbers, email addresses, IM accounts, Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts, etc. etc. I’ve had this for years. This has nothing to do with company size. It has to do with putting forth an effort to create a relationship with individuals at Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, etc. We all go to the same conferences. Figure out how to connect with people at the search engines. HINT: Start with the people that nobody is swarming around (i.e. not Matt Cutts, Nathan Buggia, etc.). The people that do not have swarms of over-eager people around them are more open to communication. BIGGER HINT: Don’t be pushy. Treat them as a person not as a search engine contact. Consider it a long-term investment not something you can utilize next week. Don’t ask for things that they aren’t  suppose to share. BIGGEST HINT: Don’t blast their contact info. Don’t blast that you hung out with so and so. My mere mention of this portion of my day may come back to bite me.

4:30pm – 5:00pm – CMS & Technical changes project management

Keep projects moving forward. Stay focused on long and mid-term goals. Keep your teams busy doing SEO work. I’ve made a mistake recently of letting a tech project wind down for too long. We had a groove and a great vibe with the team. Now I’ve let it spin down between projects when I should’ve had the next project already dialed in and ready to launch upon completion of the previous project. Remember to reward your teams. I like to reward as big as management will allow. Maybe that means buying pizza or maybe it means taking them out to a Chicago Cubs Series Clincher.

5:00pm – 5:30pm – QA, make sure things are still working properly with recent roll-outs/changes

Things break. Code changes. Over eager tech and editorial people try to ‘fix’ things they ‘see’ without telling you. Take a few minutes each day to look over different portions of your site and code to make sure no surprises are popping up. I recently found some meta noindex tags on entire Tribune blogs this way. How did it happen? Not entirely sure, but I made sure I removed them. I even got a call from one of the columnists thanking me for ‘whatever I did to drive more traffic from search engines’.

5:30pm – 6:00pm – Evangelize SEO with upper management

Note the time that I do this! Don’t do it in the middle of the day. They are busy people. However, they tend to work later than most and it looks really good if you swing by their office after hours to drop a quick note about an SEO win, project update, or advice. The goal is to keep this short. Under no circumstances should it last more than 30 minutes. Have a list of things that you want to talk about but don’t be hung up on trying to mention all of them. Go with the flow of the conversation. Make sure you’ve done your homework so you don’t get blindsighted. Upper management is the best about pulling some weird ass situation out of their head and asking your opinion about it. I’ve been asked about a myriad of things that has nothing to do with SEO. If you don’t know something, tell them you don’t know but you’ll get back to them—tomorrow. Upper management can tell better than anyone when you are trying to bullshit them.

6:00pm – 6:30pm – Reflect on what upper management said and where you feel their focus is at

When you are with upper management do a lot of listening to discover what is important to them and then think for the next few days how you can help them accomplish what’s important to them within your area of expertise. The key there is to stay within your area of expertise. Do NOT tell them how to do their job though. Even within your area of expertise provide suggestions to them. Don’t tell them what to do. Form things as leading questions. For example: “What do you think about making changes to the way in which we name photo files? I think it could help to drive more photo gallery page views that I know is a goal of yours and I think I can get the team to get it done within the next couple of weeks. I’m estimating it could drive an additional 25% in photo gallery page views from search engines.”

6:30pm – 7:00pm – Call my 5-year old son whom lives in Washington, DC

Personal time . . . don’t forget your family. You won’t be at your company for forever. But you will have your family for forever. Take time out to stay focused on that. I’m a divorcee and my obsession with work was one of many contributing factors to the divorce. Not seeing my son everyday is tough. Don’t make the same mistakes. Take time out!

7:00pm – 8:00pm – Special projects

Do the special projects that you are personally passionate about during times that won’t sacrifice the ‘meat and potatoes’ of your business. I choose to do it completely outside of normal business hours. I know this may not be typical and most of your will have some type of family/social life which you should make the higher priority. Just keep in mind that your personal passions may not necessarily be the best ROI. Get the highest ROI items knocked out before you do the stuff you are addicted to doing. This will help to reduce procrastination of tasks that will have the higher impact.

8:00pm – 9:00pm – Read RSS feeds, Sphinn.com, etc.

Keep up to date with the search community. However you want to do that. I personally use RSS, some podcasts (but the ads on WebmasterRadio.fm drive me so crazy I can’t handle listening to them daily), Sphinn.com, SEOmoz.org, I follow a lot of SEOs on Twitter, and have quite a few people in my IM list that reach out to me from time to time with ‘breaking SEO news’. This industry is constantly changing. Keep up to date with it.

9:00pm – 9:30pm – Getting ready to leave and go home

I know I work longer hours than most and I don’t work this late every night. I find SEO fun and exciting. I find it to be a pastime as well as job. Thus, it’s not something I dread doing. If you look above there is some personal time in there as well (the call to my son, the special projects which is mainly fun for me, etc.). I live 30 minutes away from work and my son lives in another city. This works for me . . . it may not work for you. It may not be something you choose to do.

9:30pm – 10:00pm – Get some food, take care of personal business

I’m a bachelor again. Food is a necessity not a pleasure. I eat whatever when I get home and take a look at the few bills I get (most are built into my rent). Toss most of them aside until I get the online notifications but feel good that I kept the post office employees receiving a check although I’m finding less and less of a need for any type of physical mail other than receipt of goods.

10:00pm – 11:00pm – Watch some form of television, usually online

I watch some TV. Usually on one of the broadcast sites such as Fox.com, NBC.com, or CWTV.com. It’s my way to unwind from the day and let my brain focus on something other than work.

11:00pm – 1:00am – Social Media engagement and management

This is purely for enjoyment for me. Very little work related interactions occur. There are usually a ton of people on Twitter late at night (keep in mind I’m on Central time) and they are considerably more fun to interact with when they are at home versus being at work trying to get things done. If you want to know more about the PEOPLE in the industry, hop on Twitter or Facebook IM at night. If you want to know more about what they do for a living, check them out during the day.

1:00am – 1:30am – Go to bed

Yeah . . . I’m a night owl. ;-)

DISCLAIMER: This is not a verbatim day for me. It’s more of a typical week broken down into a day to include most of the important elements. I was also sensitive to when I normally do particular activities and why I choose to do them when I do them. My life could never be this planned and nor would I want it to be. One of the best things about working for Tribune is that I have no idea what event tomorrow may occur that will warrant some SEO work to be done. Maybe no event will occur and I can continue my other SEO tasks. Tomorrow is completely unwritten . . . that’s very cool to me.

I hope you enjoyed this 3,500 word, 7 page blog post. ;-)

About Brent D. Payne

Brent D. Payne is the person leading the charge for SEO within Tribune Interactive where he recently doubled the number of unique visitors from search engines (year over year) for the Tribune Interactive properties such as Chicago Tribune and L.A. Times. He works closely with both editorial leads and technical leads within Tribune as well as working with external companies such as search engines, outside consultants, or other enterprise sites. When Brent isn’t doing SEO, he is . . . well, doing SEO. Yeah, it pretty much consumes his life . . . at least when he doesn’t have his 5-year old son.

Pilgrim’s Partners: SponsoredReviews.com - Bloggers earn cash, Advertisers build buzz!

View original here:
The day in the life of an in-house SEO at Tribune - After Lunch

Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Services
Web Hosting Dedicated Servers Forex Investment Web Design Voice over IP
Products
Clothing & Fashion Mobile Phones Electronics eBooks & Info Music & Movies
Shopping
Shopping - US Shopping - UK Shopping - EU Shopping Info US Shopping Portal
Blogs
Real Estate Fashion Technology Business News